Please bring _Camera Lucida_ See you all, Robert

President Alexander Meets with US Secretary of Education
more..U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A , A C A D E M I C S E N A T E BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ
November 30, 2009
Open letter from the Academic Council to the University of California community
more..TPS: Rancière “The Emancipated Spectator” (Preziosi “Plato’s Dilemma”)
November 21, 2009
Introduction
Today, I want to (1) give a brief and general overview on the text at issue, “The Emancipated Spectator,” (2) Rancière and his conception of politics, aesthetics, equality, and emancipation, and (3) foreground and highlight what is only briefly discussed by Rancière in the aforementioned text, namely, Plato and art, artistry, artifice; I want to ask some questions and make a few provocations—and all of these will be, at times, interlaced. Then I should like to focus more specifically on “The Emancipated Spectator,” completely opening it up to and for the class for discussions and insights, in order to think how art (broadly construed) can be, and is being, rethought—as well as what politics are at work, or can be put to work. In all of this, I hope we will be as critical of Rancière as he is critical of other philosophers and artists, art movements, and aesthetic theories.
more..For Rancière, any experience involves/evokes a (re-)configuration of the "visible" and the "sensible," an order of possible actions/enactments, and possible situations. In other words, the "distribution of the sensible" (Rancière) defines a "system" that opens up the ability -- if not the possibility of the possible -- to perceive the existence of something held in common ("the common of the community") and the torsions ("dissagreements") that apportion places and parts within, as well as around, it. Thus, this theoritcal position(ing) entails that there is both a politics immanent to artistic praxes and that there exists no political configuration which is not always-already founded on a decision regarding the visibility of its pieces and spatio-temporal possiblities and multiplications. Thus, in this proposed class, which will be held, I hope, during the College Art Association's annual meeting, which takes place in February 2010, I would like to explore the politics, possiblities, and potenialites of Rancière's "distribution of the sensible," "politics of aesthetics," and "political disagreement" -- as well as the differences and similaties (in-)between "art," "aesthetics," and "politics." In a sense, explore the architecture of Rancière's theoretical thought(s), and how it is played out and can be played out in art and architecture (and even beyond to the everyday).
These classes would be about personal archives: photographic albums in particular. it will be a participatory class where all participants are encouraged to bring in their personal photo albums and share stories, experiences etc. The aim of the sessions is to re-create or find ways of approaching memories through photographs. Now that most photographs tend to be digital, we will look at the actual experience of handling material photographs.
Please bring _Camera Lucida_ See you all, Robert
How does art do and un-do the artist and the viewer? How does (and why does) art history and criticism "tame" the radicality of art practices and productions (e.g., Dada, Surrealism, the SI, etc.)? How can art be "used" to re-think life, or does art create a(nother) life, which is to say a(nother) world? How to live that life -- or (inhabit that) world? Readings will consist of selections from Agambin, Bourriaud, Cixous, Jones, Nancy, Ranciere, etc. The class, after the first meeting will decide the readings and the direction of the reading/discussion group.
By the madness which interrupts it, a work of art opens a void, a moment of silence, a question without answer, provokes a breach without reconciliation where the world is forced to question itself. — Foucault, Madness and Civilization From there and differently ...
Since the early to mid-20th century artists conceived the viewer as a passive recipient of "aesthetic experience" / the "spectacle of mass culture" (for example, Brecht's critique of theater that made the viewer passive and his theorization of "epic theater," the Situationist International and Debord's "Society of the Spectacle" and the Independent Group, which both critiqued the passive spectator versus the active spectator). The concept/construction of the passive spectator was also critically re-thought and re-theorized by Artaud, who called for engagement, for active spectators.
more..in this experimental writing course, we will explore the boundaries of believability, authenticity, and the recently discovered notion of truthiness using forms like listmaking, found texts, and unreliable narrators to get at a more reliable approximation of truth. we will read texts that explore lying, integrity, and irrelevance while creating others that don't.
Theory & Practice.
this is a really interesting class that can explode into a million directions. i didn't realize till today that art historians and visual culture folks are engaged in a deep objectphilia. i mean i knew but i forgot. make sense? as ever, robert
this class would be about walter benjamin.
Initial Reading List:
Walter Benjamin - Theses on the Philosophy of History
Howard Caygill - Walter Benjamin. The colour of experience
Eduardo Cadava - Words of Light
Jacques Derrida - Faith and Knowledge
Giorgio Agamben - The Time that Remains
Here is an email exchange between me and my adviser, which touches on a point raised in class: Christianizing "messianic time" ... My Email: Dear dP, I was wondering if you would want to have a brief email exchange about Agamben and messianic time. I am reading
On 7 August, 2009 at 7:00PM, The Public School will screen "Derrida" (the un-documentary). This screening is in relation to the class on "Messianic Time" (currently being held during the month of August, 2009 on Saturdays) After the screening we will have a brief discussion of the documentary. Of particular interest is Derrida's deconstruction of the documentary, deconstruction (in a nutshell), futurity (l'avenir) vs. the future (le futur), love, and (auto)biography.
The film quotes (by Derrida) are on to http://a.aaaarg.org/ (Derrida, Jacques "Film Quotes")
An interesting clip on l'avenir from the "documentary" is on Youtube:
As ever, Robert
Please come to the screening of Derrida on the 7 August at 7PM. Please bring the film quotes, which are under Derrida on http://a.aaaarg.org/ There is a brilliant youtube clip of the opening of "Derrida": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgLDHbF3lr0 in which Derrida discusses "the future"
The reading group will look at Lacan's notion of _jouissance_ in relation to Freud, Kant, Genet, Crimp, and Bersani. It will explore issues of the neighbor, homo- and hetero-sexuality, and the death drive (other theories may follow, or swell up). In one sense, this is a follow-up to the SM class offered by TPS. Tentative reading list: Tim Dean, _Beyond Sexuality_ (selections) Lacan, _Ethics of Psychoanalysis_ (selections) Lacan, "Kant with Sade" Freud, _Beyond the Pleasure Principle_ (selections Freud, _Civilization and Its Discontents_ (selections) Bersani and Adam Phillips, _Intimacies_ (selections) Bersani, "Is the Rectum a Grave" Crimp, _Mourning and Militancy_ (selections) William Haver, _The Body of this Death_ (selections) John Paul Ricco, _The Logic of the Lure_ (selections) -Other texts or essays maybe added- -All readings will be uploaded to http://a.aaaarg.or Films: Genet, "Un Chant Amour" Paul Morris, "Plattin' Seed" ("adult") David Lynch, "Blue Velvet" -Other films maybe added- The first class will be devoted to an articulation of the differences between Freud and Lacan and the "death drive," Lacan's theorization "jouissance" -- and we will watch a film segment. Finally, the first class will decide the trajectory of the remaining classes. It is hoped this class can meet 4-6 times on the weekend.
Guattari, “To Have Done with the Massacre of the Body,” in _Chaosophy_ (2nd semiotext[e] edition):
I meant NYC CAA 2011, but wrote 2010. Nonetheless, I am having a panel for CAA in NYC on Ranciere, and Chicago is not that far from NYC. To answer your question more clearly, it is a working through and a preparation.
09 Nov 2009 6:20PM