THE
PUBLIC
SCHOOL

TELIC ARTS EXCHANGE

  • proposal date
  • tentative title
  • number of people interested
  • 1 year ago
  • Marx
    already happened
  • 25
Marx
proposed by sean dockray

We will be sections 4-6 in the 3rd meeting of our group, watching David Harvey's video lecture on the subject, and then hopefully pick up on our discussion about how value is created from nothing (without a commodity), as well as other questions that arise. Anyone is welcome, including those who didn't come to a prior meeting.

--

A self-guided group study of Marx (Capital). One idea would be: read Peter Singer's very short and accessible books on Hegel and Marx. Then watch videos of David Harvey's 13 lectures on "Capital." (http://davidharvey.org/)

I think that I am interested in seeing how our current financial situation converges and diverges with classical economics as well as Marx's critiques. As a side note, I hope we could also talk about contemporary cultural production, creative labor, etc.

We'll start with one meeting and hopefully schedule many more until we get through all of Capital.

Date
January 31, 2009 at 2:00pm
Location
972B Chung King Road
Teacher
David Harvey’s disembodied image + our collective imagination
Limit
15
Fee
5

Class Status

  • proposed
  • needs a teacher
  • scheduling
  • scheduled

Comment

if the class started over i would be interested in joining too

from: lakshmiluthra

28 Feb 2009 8:43PM

I'd love to rejoin if we are starting over!

from: hbursch

27 Feb 2009 10:38AM

can we have a follow up class on derrida's "specters of marx"?

from: robtsum

18 Oct 2008 6:40AM

this sounds great. sean would you teach it? do we need a teacher? or can it work more as reading group? I know marx pretty well and can help out finding readings.

from: chandler

18 Oct 2008 8:24AM

I'm down for this one. Chandler, how about some selections from the 'Manuscrpts of 1844 ?'

from: mario

18 Oct 2008 11:51PM

this sounds great. i've been wanting to approach capital for some time, but have only read marx's eighteenth brumaire. capital always seemed too dense and scary, so tackling it as a group seems ideal. also (as i always tend to point out), spivak has worked intensively with capital and has some really interesting essays on it...

from: D.A.N.

19 Oct 2008 5:25AM

that was sarah, by the way.

from: D.A.N.

19 Oct 2008 5:26AM

mario, i think if we want to get into cultural production and creative labor we must! it also sheds some interesting light on capital.

from: chandler

19 Oct 2008 5:58PM

I think relating Marx to contemporary events and cultural-economic affairs would be productive; see e.g., Terranova on "Free Labour" (http://tinyurl.com/y8tf65), which begins

> Working in the digital media industry is not as much fun as it is made out to be. The
> 'NetSlaves' of the eponymous Webzine are becoming increasingly vociferous about the shamelessly
> exploitative nature of the job, its punishing work rhythms, and its ruthless casualization...

I've also been wondering if Hilferding's Finanzkapital (1910; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilferding#Finance_Capital) might shed any light on the current ongoing paroxysms of the global financial system.

from: six

20 Oct 2008 4:47PM

From Capital Vol. III:

"In a system of production, where the entire continuity of the reproduction process rests upon credit, a crisis must obviously occur - a tremendous rush for means of payment - when credit suddenly ceases and only cash payments have validity. At first glance, therefore, the whole crisis seems to be merely a credit and money crisis. And in fact it is only a question of the convertibility of bills of exchange into money. But the majority of these bills represent actual sales and purchases, whose extension far beyond the needs of society is, after all, the basis of the whole crisis. At the same time, an enormous quantity of these bills of exchange represents plain swindle, which now reaches the light of day and collapses; furthermore, unsuccessful speculation with the capital of other people; finally, commodity-capital which has depreciated or is completely unsaleable, or returns that can never more be realized again. The entire artificial system of forced expansion of the reproduction process cannot, of course, be remedied by having some bank, like the Bank of England, give to all the swindlers the deficient capital by means of its paper and having it buy up all the depreciated commodities at their old nominal values. Incidentally, everything here appears distorted, since in this paper world, the real price and its real basis appear nowhere, but only bullion, metal coin, notes, bills of exchange, securities. Particularly in centres where the entire money business of the country is concentrated, like London, does this distortion become apparent; the entire process becomes incomprehensible; it is less so in centres of production."

from: D.A.N.

20 Oct 2008 5:16PM

This is an intimidating class to try and schedule because 13 videos + 2 books requires a certain commitment that I don't know if we could pull off. We talked about just starting by offering one class, and seeing where it goes from there. How does that sound? Should we bother with the 2 Peter Singer books? (I find them very clear, engaging, and easy to read)

We could skip those texts and just watch Peter Singer on a couch talking about Marx and Hegel for 40 minutes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxjnG1X510A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDjXBr3RtKk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYX9UP55ISc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-Eg_fLP-5U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbwZw0wy_n0

So what day of the week should I shoot for, for a first meeting where we watch the David Harvey intro lecture?
It is 111 minutes long. Otherwise, we could read the 2 books and then watch the 45 minute long Peter Singer television episode.

from: D.A.N.

1 Nov 2008 5:28AM

my two cents: i think the readings can be optional and we watch the videos, and then discuss. i think weekends are best. maybe a tow day event that then spreads out from there? -robert

from: robtsum

1 Nov 2008 4:31PM

Maybe we should narrow the focus just to Capital, and read selections from it as well as viewing the Harvey lectures. In any case, I think it's important that we engage with the primary texts, not solely via Singer and Harvey.

from: BenE

1 Nov 2008 4:38PM

i echo the desire to engage with the primary texts, but also think video lectures + selected excerpts of Capital might be more manageable as a first foray than attempting to read the entire text.

from: six

1 Nov 2008 5:21PM

yeah, I hear you. I doubt any of us have time to read all of Capital. But I'd like to read at least some of it unfiltered. Weekends are best for me too.

from: BenE

1 Nov 2008 6:15PM

For the one meeting class, which I assume is a first meeting, from which edition/publisher/ect. will we be reading from?
I would rather have the text than the PDF.
-Robert

from: robtsum

1 Dec 2008 5:44PM

Is there anything we should read before the first class?

from: BenE

3 Dec 2008 1:48PM

Let's read "The Commodity" and "The Process of Exchange", which is just over 60 pages, and keeps pace with David Harvey's lectures. I'm reading from the Vintage edition and apparently page numbers harvey refers to work for Vintage and Penguin editions. I don't know what other people have?

from: D.A.N.

9 Dec 2008 8:37AM

when does this class take place? the date?
sorry if i should know this.
-robert

from: robtsum

14 Dec 2008 8:33PM

This class will be meeting on Saturday (Dec 20) from 2-5pm.
As I wrote earlier, we'll be reading the first 2 chapters:

from: D.A.N.

15 Dec 2008 3:10PM

After the first class, we decided to have a second meeting on Saturday, January 10 from 2-5pm. We'll be reading the third section of Capital ("Money") and watching the corresponding David Harvey video. Anyone is welcome (you don't have to have come to the first meeting), but we will still be limited to 15 to keep discussion tight

from: D.A.N.

2 Jan 2009 8:17AM

How can we watch the David Harvey video out of class? I may not be able to come, but will still pay to watch the vidz.
I am becoming over committed ...

from: robtsum

6 Jan 2009 10:50AM

hey Sean,
Any chance we can move the date of the next class? I'm going to have to be out of town that weekend.
thanks,
B.

from: BenE

18 Jan 2009 9:00PM

sure
does the following saturday (feb 7) work? who would probably be coming then?

from: D.A.N.

25 Jan 2009 7:45AM

yes, that works (for me -- actually any weekend). i missed the last class. can you send a reminder out?
-robert

from: robtsum

25 Jan 2009 8:12AM

Feb 7 works for me--thanks.

from: BenE

25 Jan 2009 5:58PM

This is just a quick reminder about class tomorrow at 2pm.
We're watching the 3rd David Harvey lecture about chapter 4-6.
I also came across this lecture (well only 20 minutes of it are available online)
on fictitious capital, which was hosted by Mute magazine recently.
Maybe we could watch that as well? We'll decide tomorrow

http://blip.tv/file/667781/

from: D.A.N.

7 Feb 2009 1:38AM

Anyone interested in this class may want to check out "Class-sicles " on The Public School site -- which is on Felix Guattari's _Chaosophy: Texts and Interviews, 1972-1977_

If you are interested and have this text, then please check out the sections in the book to see if you would want to lead a class. Ideally there will be one class for each section: that is 5 classes, ideally.

For more on the book see

As ever, Robert

from: robtsum

15 Feb 2009 5:05PM

Ben and Nik, did we say that this Saturday was the next meeting? I'm not ready for it! I need to ask for it to be postponed... I also have other news - there is another incarnation of this exact same class starting up a few blocks away, by the cornfield. Since they are behind us, I wonder if we drop in and see how it is and maybe join forces? It would also give a chance for the people who dropped off to get back in the game.

from: D.A.N.

20 Feb 2009 6:35AM

Okay by me -- when is the other class meeting?

from: BenE

20 Feb 2009 5:29PM